Still stuck on my usual, and in the mood for an old favorite, I picked up The Morning Gift. I really am so boring, when did I last read this? Last year? But you know, it's just so so good. In previous readings, I have noted that Ruth's habit of "living deep" and the way everyone seems to be so enamored of it are not particularly appealing, but I can ignore it and just enjoy the rest of it. On this reading, I have to say, it didn't even particularly bother me. Not sure what it was, whether I'm just getting less finicky or there is something I appreciated more, probably mostly the former. But regardless, I didn't even have that to annoy me. There was still the sadness of WWII, no getting around that, but as before, it isn't really enough in the forefront to be too much of a disturbance.
Which leaves me free to enjoy the meat of this book... succulent, delicious prime rib in this case. Seriously, I do not think there is another book with so many "moments". So much time together, such a perfect balance of angst with lightness, so much unspoken but there if you read between the lines. I mean I'm just wishing I had brought it with me to reread, it was that good. I don't even quite know how or why, but this book is pretty close to perfection for what it is.
Verdict: 5/5
Friday, December 30, 2016
Favorite Short
Having finished Twilight, I had some hope of returning the library (well I always have hope of that), and so picked up something small to tide me over one Shabbos - The Ordinary Princess. Read and reviewed before, of course, this is a lovely little book that loses nothing in reading after reading. Supremely easy to read (I read part of it out loud to my kids, they didn't appreciate it, but liked hearing the word princess), a charming tale with no tension, and a wonderful happy ending. I'm not sure I'm a big fan of the lessons of this book, it's a typical fairy tale with questionable morality, but you know, all in good fun. Go Perry and Amy.
Verdict; 5/5
Verdict; 5/5
My Sadly Low Taste
Well, I've left myself get behind again and the pressure is on. Let's see if I can scrape out some mildly entertaining reviews, despite the books no longer being fresh in my mind :) Back before Thanksgiving, I had still not gone to the library (well I still haven't), and, though I heart my Heyer of course, I was looking for something slightly more novel (limited of course, to my home collection). After a survey, I ventured upon some long-untrodden ground - Twilight.
The background - back when the first movie came out, I got really into this series for like a few months. Watched the movie (more than once :)), read the books, online fandom, all that. I was so into them, I bought the books for rereading. But I think I only got about halfway through the second before my interest wained, and I don't think I picked up the books again. They really are atrocious - terribly written, over-dramatic, Mary-Sueish, sensationalist, even creepy. But still. Romantic :) So I ventured on them once more.
Twilight (the first one), is really amazingly badly written - so bad it's good type. The prose is dry yet florid, there is very little story up until the end, and it's really weird that a 110-year old guy likes a high school student and a high school student likes a monster. Sentiments like "if I weren't crazy, I'd say away" don't help this. On top of that, there's the Mary-Sueness I mentioned, how everyone for some reason is just obsessed with Bella. But with all, at some point, I just started enjoying the book. Interestingly enough, I think that point was when the plot actually started to pick up, *after* the initial will-they-won't-they is mostly complete. I say interestingly, because usually, that's exactly what I enjoy reading - once they're together, it's kind of boring. But with this, I guess the will-they-won't-they was just weird, and the follow up had some actual plot. I'm not saying it was riveting, but I don't know, there's something about it that keeps me, at least, reading.
Once I finished Twilight, I had to read Midnight Sun, of course (actually, did I even finish it? I might have read the two simultaneously). If Twilight is basically fanfic, Midnight Sun is actual fanfic, but by the author herself - and my favorite type of fanfic, namely, guy's POV. It is so much more romantic to read what is going in Edward's mind over Bella's. But of course, not the most stellar writing. Not what I'm reading it for, hein?
So once I was fully immersing myself in the Twilight world, next step had to be the movies. Of these, I had only seen the first one before, since the rest came out after my short-lived obsession was over (I've seen it more than once though). The first movie is really bad - of course it's always fun to see characters brought to life, but it was just so dark, unnecessarily - and weirdly abrupt, like if I didn't know the story I don't know if I'd even follow half the conversation. Still fun though - Robert Pattinson really isn't too bad looking, in used that movie at least ;)
So once finished with the book, the accompanying fanfic, and the movie, I moved on with the series (by the way, this was mostly done over Thanksgiving weekend, which is how I managed to have the time to fit all this in). Next up was New Moon. This was one is the least fun, since Edward's barely in it. But to my surprise, I found that I enjoyed it anyway - the plot thing again. It is *so much* better written than Twilight. Never was a huge fan of Jacob, and still am not, but the rivalry between him and Edward doesn't really exist (it's always Edward) so it's not too annoying from that point of view. Bella is as Mary-Sueish and strange as ever, but you know, you get to it. And remembering the short except from Edward's POV I had read earlier, I could easily imagine his side, which did make it more romantic. Basically, this book wasn't too hard to get through, and the ending certainly picks up. Once I finished the book, I moved on the movie (maybe it wasn't in that order, might have started the next book first, but whatever). This movie is *much* better than the first - actually mostly coherent, rather than just picking up random scenes from the book. And it somewhat interesting to see some of the more mythical elements depicted - the Volturi and werewolves. Also, I hadn't watched it before, so it had the charm of novelty.
Book #3 - Eclipse - this is the one where I couldn't even remember what happened. Basically, this is the story of Edward and Jacob fighting over Bella, but like I said, there's never really a question. It's always Edward - and not only because Bella likes him better, but really he's just a better and cooler person. So that's fun. And the book continues the trend of better writing/plot compared to Twilight. Third movie same as second, much better than the first as well.
Book #4 - The whole first part of this book is wish fulfillment, so a bit silly, but eh, I can read about the vampire's fabulous lifestyles. The second part of the book is a pretty fun plot, what with the gathering of the vampires and outsmarting the Volturi. Movies (there were two for this one) reflected that - wish fulfillment in the first one, and more action in the second. Altogether, satisfying enough ending.
I would say I thoroughly enjoyed my immersion into Twilight. Watching the movies definitely helped, as did doing the whole thing at once. This is the kind of thing you can only enjoy when you're so into it you can ignore all the flaws. So don't know when I'll have a chance to do this again, but it was a fun experience.
Verdict: 3/5 (I really, really can't rate these books higher, I'm sorry :))
The background - back when the first movie came out, I got really into this series for like a few months. Watched the movie (more than once :)), read the books, online fandom, all that. I was so into them, I bought the books for rereading. But I think I only got about halfway through the second before my interest wained, and I don't think I picked up the books again. They really are atrocious - terribly written, over-dramatic, Mary-Sueish, sensationalist, even creepy. But still. Romantic :) So I ventured on them once more.
Twilight (the first one), is really amazingly badly written - so bad it's good type. The prose is dry yet florid, there is very little story up until the end, and it's really weird that a 110-year old guy likes a high school student and a high school student likes a monster. Sentiments like "if I weren't crazy, I'd say away" don't help this. On top of that, there's the Mary-Sueness I mentioned, how everyone for some reason is just obsessed with Bella. But with all, at some point, I just started enjoying the book. Interestingly enough, I think that point was when the plot actually started to pick up, *after* the initial will-they-won't-they is mostly complete. I say interestingly, because usually, that's exactly what I enjoy reading - once they're together, it's kind of boring. But with this, I guess the will-they-won't-they was just weird, and the follow up had some actual plot. I'm not saying it was riveting, but I don't know, there's something about it that keeps me, at least, reading.
Once I finished Twilight, I had to read Midnight Sun, of course (actually, did I even finish it? I might have read the two simultaneously). If Twilight is basically fanfic, Midnight Sun is actual fanfic, but by the author herself - and my favorite type of fanfic, namely, guy's POV. It is so much more romantic to read what is going in Edward's mind over Bella's. But of course, not the most stellar writing. Not what I'm reading it for, hein?
So once I was fully immersing myself in the Twilight world, next step had to be the movies. Of these, I had only seen the first one before, since the rest came out after my short-lived obsession was over (I've seen it more than once though). The first movie is really bad - of course it's always fun to see characters brought to life, but it was just so dark, unnecessarily - and weirdly abrupt, like if I didn't know the story I don't know if I'd even follow half the conversation. Still fun though - Robert Pattinson really isn't too bad looking, in used that movie at least ;)
So once finished with the book, the accompanying fanfic, and the movie, I moved on with the series (by the way, this was mostly done over Thanksgiving weekend, which is how I managed to have the time to fit all this in). Next up was New Moon. This was one is the least fun, since Edward's barely in it. But to my surprise, I found that I enjoyed it anyway - the plot thing again. It is *so much* better written than Twilight. Never was a huge fan of Jacob, and still am not, but the rivalry between him and Edward doesn't really exist (it's always Edward) so it's not too annoying from that point of view. Bella is as Mary-Sueish and strange as ever, but you know, you get to it. And remembering the short except from Edward's POV I had read earlier, I could easily imagine his side, which did make it more romantic. Basically, this book wasn't too hard to get through, and the ending certainly picks up. Once I finished the book, I moved on the movie (maybe it wasn't in that order, might have started the next book first, but whatever). This movie is *much* better than the first - actually mostly coherent, rather than just picking up random scenes from the book. And it somewhat interesting to see some of the more mythical elements depicted - the Volturi and werewolves. Also, I hadn't watched it before, so it had the charm of novelty.
Book #3 - Eclipse - this is the one where I couldn't even remember what happened. Basically, this is the story of Edward and Jacob fighting over Bella, but like I said, there's never really a question. It's always Edward - and not only because Bella likes him better, but really he's just a better and cooler person. So that's fun. And the book continues the trend of better writing/plot compared to Twilight. Third movie same as second, much better than the first as well.
Book #4 - The whole first part of this book is wish fulfillment, so a bit silly, but eh, I can read about the vampire's fabulous lifestyles. The second part of the book is a pretty fun plot, what with the gathering of the vampires and outsmarting the Volturi. Movies (there were two for this one) reflected that - wish fulfillment in the first one, and more action in the second. Altogether, satisfying enough ending.
I would say I thoroughly enjoyed my immersion into Twilight. Watching the movies definitely helped, as did doing the whole thing at once. This is the kind of thing you can only enjoy when you're so into it you can ignore all the flaws. So don't know when I'll have a chance to do this again, but it was a fun experience.
Verdict: 3/5 (I really, really can't rate these books higher, I'm sorry :))
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
A Grand Story
I finished my library books and needed something else. In the mood of total indulgence, I selected a tried-and-true Heyer, The Grand Sophie. This was one of my first Heyers, and, while I've loved it since that first time, it has gone up and down in relative estimation over the years. The romance is not the *most* satisfying; Charles Rivenhall not the most dashing of heroes; too much other stuff going on. Such have been the minor complaints I have had about this book over the years. On this read (and earlier ones as well, don't get me wrong), I appreciated what made this the book the Sps recommended as a starter - Sophie's completely indefatigable, unsinkable self. She is never at a loss, schemes to perfection, and stays the best of friends and relatives in the process. Great fun, great gun, ya know? This is not a book where there is any tension (not that GHs generally have too much of it). Sophie masterminds it all from start to finish. I love it when the main character does that. And even better, Charles keeps up with her every step (otherwise it would be no fun - no thanks to humbled love interests). And speaking of love interest, don't get me wrong, there's a good serving of romance here too. So a main character that really might be GH's most fun creation, and alls-well-that-ends-well ending without too much complication in the interim, and a nice dose of the good stuff (romance that is). Squee!
Verdict: 5/5
Verdict: 5/5
A Turn of the Page
Well it's been a while... I had one last book to review of my library haul, the one I was so excited about after the last book of my last library set - the next Flavia de Luce. I finished it over Succos but, since I had no more library books, just took me a while to get to this review. So anyway - I was excited to read this book because 1) I very much enjoyed the one before this and 2) the ending of the last book left open some juicy possibilities - namely, Harriet's return.
Well, as I maybe should have guessed, Harriet's return was not really that - merely, they found her body and returned it to Buckshaw. Not just not the happy ending we could have had - but, in fact, very sad, as the de Luce's had to confront the certainty of Harriet's death. So quite a bit more serious for that reason alone.
But that was really the least of the differences in this book from previous ones. The mystery in this case is not the murder of a random villager, with Flavia pottering around and solving it in her own way. There is a murder, but it takes second fiddle to Flavia's exploration of her mother's past. Definitely somewhat interesting to get a backstory but we lose much of the country village charm of the earlier books. And on top of that, uh wow, quite the backstory. Spies, heroes, villains - not your staid old English family. I mean, it's cool that Colonel and Harriet were so awesome, and makes some sense, seeing their talented offspring. But it's a bit of a leap from past books.
And at the conclusion, even more of a leap. We are asked to believe that Flavia is specially tasked with taking over the mantle of the family business (spying and whatnot). And that her sisters' resentment of her is rooted in jealousy of her position. And that she now has to be taken away to be properly educated. It's all just rather out of the blue.
But I suppose Alan Bradley was getting bored with the old formula and wanted to move things along. I get that. Now, I guess, we'll get some new mysteries set at Flavia's boarding school? Guess we'll see. I hope wherever they are, they are back to their old charming form, not too full of backstory.
Verdict: 2.9/5
Well, as I maybe should have guessed, Harriet's return was not really that - merely, they found her body and returned it to Buckshaw. Not just not the happy ending we could have had - but, in fact, very sad, as the de Luce's had to confront the certainty of Harriet's death. So quite a bit more serious for that reason alone.
But that was really the least of the differences in this book from previous ones. The mystery in this case is not the murder of a random villager, with Flavia pottering around and solving it in her own way. There is a murder, but it takes second fiddle to Flavia's exploration of her mother's past. Definitely somewhat interesting to get a backstory but we lose much of the country village charm of the earlier books. And on top of that, uh wow, quite the backstory. Spies, heroes, villains - not your staid old English family. I mean, it's cool that Colonel and Harriet were so awesome, and makes some sense, seeing their talented offspring. But it's a bit of a leap from past books.
And at the conclusion, even more of a leap. We are asked to believe that Flavia is specially tasked with taking over the mantle of the family business (spying and whatnot). And that her sisters' resentment of her is rooted in jealousy of her position. And that she now has to be taken away to be properly educated. It's all just rather out of the blue.
But I suppose Alan Bradley was getting bored with the old formula and wanted to move things along. I get that. Now, I guess, we'll get some new mysteries set at Flavia's boarding school? Guess we'll see. I hope wherever they are, they are back to their old charming form, not too full of backstory.
Verdict: 2.9/5
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Romance with Drama Stuffing
Sometime in the summer, Peryl commented on how much she loved the new Marisa de los Santos. The Edison library only had the ones I've already read, so I didn't take it out in the summer, but East Brunswick had the new one, so it made the Succos list. I was definitely mildly excited to read it, because Peryl had liked it so much, but only mildly because 1) sorry Peryl, I just don't trust you ;) and 2) I have mildly enjoyed her previous books. Here's what can be expected from them - Definitely some romance, a good, solid romance. Drama, drama, drama. Some serious stuff - I'm now starting notice some serious family stuff. And good writing, if florid. Honestly, it's hard to remember if I had all those expectations in mind, since this book delivered on them so patly. But if I didn't, I should have.
So let's go into each of those elements in a little more detail :) The romance - Persuasion-type old lovers reunite. Nicely drawing out the angst/suspense for the course of the book. And certainly a lovely couple. Not exactly the focus of the book, but, eh, that's expected.
Drama - Every relationship is meant to be, or doomed to fail. Larger than life characters (born to be famous, uncannily omniscient). Painful significance of every incident every decision. You know the drill (or I do).
Serious family stuff - Well this one was really taken up a notch. This is not your typical broken family. Treated cruelly by his own father, Wilson rejects his "first" family completely and obsesses over his second. And even after they reconcile, he remains unrepentant. As a narrative device, it works, but pu-lease. Totally, ridiculously, over the top.
And then there's the writing. Yes, it's florid, altogether too full of similes and metaphors and turns of phrases. But yes, it's good. Good enough that despite all that other stuff I just talked about, this was still an enjoyable read. I mean, I wouldn't attribute that to the writing entirely - it did have the romance, the characters were mostly eminently likeable, and the subject matter generally wasn't terrible, but it takes some talent to keep a book like this moving. And move it did - I had no problem finishing it Shabbos afternoon instead of sleeping. So points for that, and, yes, I will be looking forward to her next one (I may even read the ones she wrote together with her husband, which appear to be YA).
Verdict: 3.75/5
So let's go into each of those elements in a little more detail :) The romance - Persuasion-type old lovers reunite. Nicely drawing out the angst/suspense for the course of the book. And certainly a lovely couple. Not exactly the focus of the book, but, eh, that's expected.
Drama - Every relationship is meant to be, or doomed to fail. Larger than life characters (born to be famous, uncannily omniscient). Painful significance of every incident every decision. You know the drill (or I do).
Serious family stuff - Well this one was really taken up a notch. This is not your typical broken family. Treated cruelly by his own father, Wilson rejects his "first" family completely and obsesses over his second. And even after they reconcile, he remains unrepentant. As a narrative device, it works, but pu-lease. Totally, ridiculously, over the top.
And then there's the writing. Yes, it's florid, altogether too full of similes and metaphors and turns of phrases. But yes, it's good. Good enough that despite all that other stuff I just talked about, this was still an enjoyable read. I mean, I wouldn't attribute that to the writing entirely - it did have the romance, the characters were mostly eminently likeable, and the subject matter generally wasn't terrible, but it takes some talent to keep a book like this moving. And move it did - I had no problem finishing it Shabbos afternoon instead of sleeping. So points for that, and, yes, I will be looking forward to her next one (I may even read the ones she wrote together with her husband, which appear to be YA).
Verdict: 3.75/5
Friday, October 28, 2016
Close Enough, Better than a Cigar
Continuing on my Succos reading spree, we have Lauren Willig's first stand-alone. I finished the Pink Carnation series during my summer reading and then went back to the stand alones now. As you may recall, I've found the Pink Carnation series to be less satisfying than it used to be. The writing somewhat too flippant, even anachronistic, the romances too similar / not angsty enough, the plots a distraction. I was ready to move on, and I think so was Lauren Willig, which is why she started on this (even before the series was finished).
The first stand-alone, The Ashford Affair, was written a few years ago, and, while there were lots of updates / teasers when it was written, some of them aren't fresh in my mind. I think it was supposed to be inspired by Out of Africa, which I haven't read, and the Mitford sisters, which I have (at least The Pursuit of Love). It *strongly* reminded me of the latter (like I think it deliberately followed the plot line of a poor but practical cousin and belle-of-the-ball debutante who runs off with husband after husband), and reminded me, too, of other books / plots that I couldn't even bring to mind. I knew exactly what would happen, not just because the book didn't keep it a secret, but because you just know that's the type - happy-ish ending but not without some tear-jerking. It actually bothered me how familiar it all seemed, still not sure if that's only because of the Mitford / Downton Abbey side, or whether I really have read more in the same vein. So much for the familiarity of the setting / plot.
What about what really matters? Well, first of all, this was, like all of LW, a "time slip" novel, where the modern-day heroine learns about her ancestor's past. My initial thought was that this device is unnecessary and distracting, the historical plot was enough and the modern story could not be fleshed out enough to be enjoyable. But I was wrong. It was actually quite enjoyable and well told, and quite a good romance. There was definitely a little bit too much melodrama about the discovery of Grandma Addie's past (not to mention that it was difficult to reconcile the dignified old woman Clemmie knew with the historical Miss Addie Gillecote). But thoroughly enjoyable romance novella.
Back to the historical story, other than being shades of the Mitfords and mostly predictable, was it good? For one thing, it was not written in the, frankly, a bit silly style of the PC series, but in a more serious tone, in keeping with the more serious story. I think it was a good trade-off. I don't need the seriousness of complex relationships and the shadow of WWI, orphans, and influenza, but the writing was a pleasure. And I guess I really do just like historical England, because even though it was not my time period and there was all that serious stuff, I was still totally happy to read it. The romance was also not my type (star-crossed lovers, not will-they-won't-they) but still satisfying in the end I guess.
In the end of the day, it wasn't my *ideal* setting or story, but it was close enough to both to be thoroughly enjoyable, due to the excellent execution. Definitely looking forward to the next one (and the one after that, already published, and the one after that, still to be published :))
Verdict: 4/5
The first stand-alone, The Ashford Affair, was written a few years ago, and, while there were lots of updates / teasers when it was written, some of them aren't fresh in my mind. I think it was supposed to be inspired by Out of Africa, which I haven't read, and the Mitford sisters, which I have (at least The Pursuit of Love). It *strongly* reminded me of the latter (like I think it deliberately followed the plot line of a poor but practical cousin and belle-of-the-ball debutante who runs off with husband after husband), and reminded me, too, of other books / plots that I couldn't even bring to mind. I knew exactly what would happen, not just because the book didn't keep it a secret, but because you just know that's the type - happy-ish ending but not without some tear-jerking. It actually bothered me how familiar it all seemed, still not sure if that's only because of the Mitford / Downton Abbey side, or whether I really have read more in the same vein. So much for the familiarity of the setting / plot.
What about what really matters? Well, first of all, this was, like all of LW, a "time slip" novel, where the modern-day heroine learns about her ancestor's past. My initial thought was that this device is unnecessary and distracting, the historical plot was enough and the modern story could not be fleshed out enough to be enjoyable. But I was wrong. It was actually quite enjoyable and well told, and quite a good romance. There was definitely a little bit too much melodrama about the discovery of Grandma Addie's past (not to mention that it was difficult to reconcile the dignified old woman Clemmie knew with the historical Miss Addie Gillecote). But thoroughly enjoyable romance novella.
Back to the historical story, other than being shades of the Mitfords and mostly predictable, was it good? For one thing, it was not written in the, frankly, a bit silly style of the PC series, but in a more serious tone, in keeping with the more serious story. I think it was a good trade-off. I don't need the seriousness of complex relationships and the shadow of WWI, orphans, and influenza, but the writing was a pleasure. And I guess I really do just like historical England, because even though it was not my time period and there was all that serious stuff, I was still totally happy to read it. The romance was also not my type (star-crossed lovers, not will-they-won't-they) but still satisfying in the end I guess.
In the end of the day, it wasn't my *ideal* setting or story, but it was close enough to both to be thoroughly enjoyable, due to the excellent execution. Definitely looking forward to the next one (and the one after that, already published, and the one after that, still to be published :))
Verdict: 4/5
Labels:
20s,
African,
aristocracy,
chic lit,
English,
historical,
New York,
romance,
time slip
Friday, October 21, 2016
Silly Fluff Without the Fun
Next up, an author I did not forget last time, but that you haven't seen yet - Sophie Kinsella. Last time, I figured I'd get the next in the Shopaholic series, but as it turned out I didn't get the next one, I got one that I had already read. When I realized that, I was just not interested in reading it, and really just not all that interested in the series at all. So I moved on the stand-alones for this one. Now Sophie Kinsella's stand-alones have, I would say, a mixed track record. In general, she's a pretty funny author, and some of these are definitely funnier than others. From a romance aspect, there's also a lot of variation, some quite enjoyable and others just missing some necessary elements. There's also the point that it seems like all of her characters are the same - silly girls and brooding boys. Doesn't sound like I like these books all that much, right? Like I said, it varies.
Moving on to this particular book, it had a strike against it right away because it was about two people. That almost always means at least one story that's not as interesting and always means not enough time given to each. Strike to was that one of the two sisters has a kid - not that I have anything against kids of course :p Just complicates things. One of the two sisters is the usual Kinsella flighty sprite, the other is somewhat more refreshingly down to the earth. Their menfolk are, respectively, refreshingly down-to-earth and a brooding male. The romances are actually both potentially interesting - persuasion-type reconciliation and P&P hate-at-first-sight. So - an ok mix of potential and meh.
But unfortunately, it didn't even live up to that mix. Most of the book consisted of Fliss (down-to-earth sibling) ruining Lottie (flighty one)'s honeymoon. Like really. We just go from incident to incident. Some interaction with Fliss and her guy, though not much. None with Lottie and her guy (who is not the one on the honeymoon with her). Sigh. Quite a disappointment. I was really just trying to get through this silly book. Which incidentally, was also continuously inappropriate (Sophie Kinsella books vary on this front as well).
So yeah, a miss. We'll see what the next one is like.
Verdict: 2/5
Moving on to this particular book, it had a strike against it right away because it was about two people. That almost always means at least one story that's not as interesting and always means not enough time given to each. Strike to was that one of the two sisters has a kid - not that I have anything against kids of course :p Just complicates things. One of the two sisters is the usual Kinsella flighty sprite, the other is somewhat more refreshingly down to the earth. Their menfolk are, respectively, refreshingly down-to-earth and a brooding male. The romances are actually both potentially interesting - persuasion-type reconciliation and P&P hate-at-first-sight. So - an ok mix of potential and meh.
But unfortunately, it didn't even live up to that mix. Most of the book consisted of Fliss (down-to-earth sibling) ruining Lottie (flighty one)'s honeymoon. Like really. We just go from incident to incident. Some interaction with Fliss and her guy, though not much. None with Lottie and her guy (who is not the one on the honeymoon with her). Sigh. Quite a disappointment. I was really just trying to get through this silly book. Which incidentally, was also continuously inappropriate (Sophie Kinsella books vary on this front as well).
So yeah, a miss. We'll see what the next one is like.
Verdict: 2/5
Prosaic Fantasy
Well the summer's haul of books was back at the library, but there was a holiday coming up - needed to have something to read over Succos! So on Sunday, Erev Succos, I made the trip out to the East Brunswick library (Edison library closed on Sundays) and picked up a new batch of new reads. So exciting :) First one I chose was Sharon Shinn, who I happened to have overlooked when picking out books last time (might have overlooked her this time as well, but I fortuitously noticed the books when passing by). I got out the one that looked to be oldest-since-the-last-one-I-read. I hadn't remembered before looking through the books, but she had started a new series with the last one I had read. I had liked the first one, and so was happy to read the second. (I happened to have just checked her website and she started another new series around then as well, not sure if I'm interested in those as they look quite different from her usual. We'll see I guess). Anyway, I didn't really remember the first book in the series, other than that I'm pretty sure I liked it. But I know Sharon Shinn's style well, so I knew what to expect. Fantasy, obviously. Finely crafted world, plenty of romance but also plot. A certain 'earthy' morality, less prudish than the historical world that the fantasy ones echo. This was a familiar read.
As far as this book in particular goes - well, first of all, the couple from the first book, Zoe and Darian, were quite present in this one, and their positions and personalities kind of made me wish I was reading that one instead :) They are cooler and more powerful than our current hero and heroine. Well, actually, it turns out that Rafe has some serious royal lineage, and he's a pretty cool guy and Josetta holds her own. But still. Anyway more than that, the romance here was *not* my kind of romance. As was made clear by the book jacket (though I had hopes it would not be the case) this was not a suspenseful, angsty kind of romance - it was an external obstacles keep them apart, and not even really so apart, one. BO-RING! I really should just give up reading these for romance at all :) And honestly, I'm not as picky about romance as I used to be, since I don't read that much anyway (and so often with romance it's a trade-off with decent writing). So to some extent, I guess I enjoyed the fantasy / story elements as well. But 1) that got old too fast, 2) it really was just a little too silly, especially when it became clear that the "elements" that govern Welce society are particular to Welce, and not even neighboring countries, 3) I thought it was silly how much time was given to the "invention" of all these things we have in our world, as if a magical society would come up with exactly what we did and 4) just a little too much plot, sorry. I was able to read the book, but honestly somewhat impatient for it to end.
And there was one more thing - the use of what seems to be an autistic child as a plot device. Didn't love that. Too sad. Also too much of our world, in the same vein as the invention of airplanes and cars.
So bottom line, the world itself wasn't bad, but the romance was lacking and the plot couldn't quite make up for it.
Verdict: 2.75/5
As far as this book in particular goes - well, first of all, the couple from the first book, Zoe and Darian, were quite present in this one, and their positions and personalities kind of made me wish I was reading that one instead :) They are cooler and more powerful than our current hero and heroine. Well, actually, it turns out that Rafe has some serious royal lineage, and he's a pretty cool guy and Josetta holds her own. But still. Anyway more than that, the romance here was *not* my kind of romance. As was made clear by the book jacket (though I had hopes it would not be the case) this was not a suspenseful, angsty kind of romance - it was an external obstacles keep them apart, and not even really so apart, one. BO-RING! I really should just give up reading these for romance at all :) And honestly, I'm not as picky about romance as I used to be, since I don't read that much anyway (and so often with romance it's a trade-off with decent writing). So to some extent, I guess I enjoyed the fantasy / story elements as well. But 1) that got old too fast, 2) it really was just a little too silly, especially when it became clear that the "elements" that govern Welce society are particular to Welce, and not even neighboring countries, 3) I thought it was silly how much time was given to the "invention" of all these things we have in our world, as if a magical society would come up with exactly what we did and 4) just a little too much plot, sorry. I was able to read the book, but honestly somewhat impatient for it to end.
And there was one more thing - the use of what seems to be an autistic child as a plot device. Didn't love that. Too sad. Also too much of our world, in the same vein as the invention of airplanes and cars.
So bottom line, the world itself wasn't bad, but the romance was lacking and the plot couldn't quite make up for it.
Verdict: 2.75/5
Friday, October 14, 2016
Livening up Idyllic England
Well, I finished the last of my library books. Was two weeks ago already, in between was Rosh Hashana, Yom Kippur, so I've been busy. Also semi-deliberately not reading the usual :) Now it's Shabbos again and I have not been back to the library to get more books, so oh well there. But meanwhile, let's get to that outstanding review. The last of the library books was another familiar author, Alan Bradley of the Flavia de Luce series. There have actually been 3! new Flavias since I last read one, but I only picked up the first of these for my trip. I like Flavias mostly because of the setting (and by setting, I mean not just the time and place, but the tone) I think (English countryside in the fifties) and definitely somewhat for Flavia herself, a... unique... preteen whose detecting capabilities (among others) are admirable. The mysteries are fine as mysteries go, you know I'm not much for mysteries per se.
This book delivered much of the same bucolic countryside, unflappable Flavia, and host of English-village side characters. The mystery was, I think, also similar (TBH, I do not much recall the previous mysteries ;)). What I would say about this mystery (which I think is common to the series) is that there is almost an over-abundance of clues. It seems like the answers could be gotten much sooner, or that many of them will be red herrings, the way the plot, and Flavia's mind, jumps from point to point without resolving any of them. But in the end (as far as I recall), it's mostly all resolved to satisfaction by Flavia. Like I said, I don't read the books for the mysteries, so the framing of the narrative in terms of clue-finding is not very important to me, but I am happy it's all resolved, nice and neatly.
What's more interesting is Flavia's day-to-day life, which, I was little surprised at, actually evolves somewhat in this latest book (the blue one is the way I think of it :) It's actually called Speaking From Among the Bones). Flavia's relationship with her sisters and her father deepens, Buckshaw is for sale... and a final cliffhanger about her mother! Very exciting :) I always wanted these books to go somewhere and now maybe they finally are. Excited to read the next book, which yay! is already published and readily available whenever I go get it ;) And meanwhile, I continued to enjoy Flavia's peregrinations about Bishop's Lacey and chemical explorations in her lab and certainly look forward to more of that as well.
Verdict: 3.75/5
(update after searching for an image - there have actually been 5 new books, counting one just released. Wow this guy is as prolific as AMS :))
This book delivered much of the same bucolic countryside, unflappable Flavia, and host of English-village side characters. The mystery was, I think, also similar (TBH, I do not much recall the previous mysteries ;)). What I would say about this mystery (which I think is common to the series) is that there is almost an over-abundance of clues. It seems like the answers could be gotten much sooner, or that many of them will be red herrings, the way the plot, and Flavia's mind, jumps from point to point without resolving any of them. But in the end (as far as I recall), it's mostly all resolved to satisfaction by Flavia. Like I said, I don't read the books for the mysteries, so the framing of the narrative in terms of clue-finding is not very important to me, but I am happy it's all resolved, nice and neatly.
What's more interesting is Flavia's day-to-day life, which, I was little surprised at, actually evolves somewhat in this latest book (the blue one is the way I think of it :) It's actually called Speaking From Among the Bones). Flavia's relationship with her sisters and her father deepens, Buckshaw is for sale... and a final cliffhanger about her mother! Very exciting :) I always wanted these books to go somewhere and now maybe they finally are. Excited to read the next book, which yay! is already published and readily available whenever I go get it ;) And meanwhile, I continued to enjoy Flavia's peregrinations about Bishop's Lacey and chemical explorations in her lab and certainly look forward to more of that as well.
Verdict: 3.75/5
(update after searching for an image - there have actually been 5 new books, counting one just released. Wow this guy is as prolific as AMS :))
Friday, September 23, 2016
My Kind of World-Building
Well, vacation is over, just a speck in the distant past, but the book reviews remain ahead. One book I am still in middle of (priorities change when vacation ends... really just it worked out like that), but one I finished on vacation, just did not take the opportunity to review while I could. And now, now the memory is fading, the impression not as vivid as it once was, the details are hazy... Oh well, reviews must be done. SO
Continuing my list of favored authors, I picked up Jasper Fforde's latest (yes, his latest - he does take a while to write books :)), the next installment of the Thursday Next books. Thursday is recovering from an assassination attempt and thus not quite on her game, so that's one fun element lost. But eh, that's not what I read these books for. What do I read them for? Ah, the cleverness, of course! The books remind me of Terry Pratchett's in that the world they portray is not an arbitrarily imagined future, but a careful satire of our own, where the slightly illogical is transformed into the obviously ridiculous. The Toast Marketing Board, law enforcement agencies dedicated to books, time travel, and creatures with unauthorized DNA, and (in this book), a stupidity surplus the government keeps an eye on. All very tongue-in-cheek of course. The tone is absurd yet subtle, and I enjoy the silly parallels between this world and ours. Beyond that, there is a cleverness in the plots themselves, somewhat complex threads that all come together nice and neatly at the end. And all with a light touch and ne'er a whiff of undue tension.
So yeah, that's why I read those books, and I'd say this one lived up to promise in that way. Anything specific? Well, it didn't take place in the BookWorld, unlike some of the recent ones, which I think was somewhat of a loss, but that's ok. As I said, I didn't particular enjoy the older, creakier Thursday who seemed somewhat behind Goliath most of the time. And though threads were resolved in the end, I thought some felt either anti-climatic or somewhat unfinished (the last one deliberately, as the next book will continue developing those). But yeah, totally clever, totally funny, totally light fun, as anticipated.
Verdict: 4/5
Continuing my list of favored authors, I picked up Jasper Fforde's latest (yes, his latest - he does take a while to write books :)), the next installment of the Thursday Next books. Thursday is recovering from an assassination attempt and thus not quite on her game, so that's one fun element lost. But eh, that's not what I read these books for. What do I read them for? Ah, the cleverness, of course! The books remind me of Terry Pratchett's in that the world they portray is not an arbitrarily imagined future, but a careful satire of our own, where the slightly illogical is transformed into the obviously ridiculous. The Toast Marketing Board, law enforcement agencies dedicated to books, time travel, and creatures with unauthorized DNA, and (in this book), a stupidity surplus the government keeps an eye on. All very tongue-in-cheek of course. The tone is absurd yet subtle, and I enjoy the silly parallels between this world and ours. Beyond that, there is a cleverness in the plots themselves, somewhat complex threads that all come together nice and neatly at the end. And all with a light touch and ne'er a whiff of undue tension.
So yeah, that's why I read those books, and I'd say this one lived up to promise in that way. Anything specific? Well, it didn't take place in the BookWorld, unlike some of the recent ones, which I think was somewhat of a loss, but that's ok. As I said, I didn't particular enjoy the older, creakier Thursday who seemed somewhat behind Goliath most of the time. And though threads were resolved in the end, I thought some felt either anti-climatic or somewhat unfinished (the last one deliberately, as the next book will continue developing those). But yeah, totally clever, totally funny, totally light fun, as anticipated.
Verdict: 4/5
Tuesday, August 30, 2016
The Universe That Just Keeps Giving
Took a break from my library haul to read the book eeeveryone's been talking about (well some people) - Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Saw it in Batya's house (in CL, if you've forgotten or I haven't mentioned it :)) and was assured it was a quick read. Expectations? Well I had already read a review of it that was somewhat positive, but heard some more negative feedback as well. So you know, not much. Also, I'm somewhat out of the HP world - have only seen films 1-3, one time, read many of the books only once (though I have seen the end of the 7th movie (in a hotel this year, forgot whether in Mountain View or Florida) and I have read parts of the 7th book multiple times) - and I don't know them well enough to know all the ins and outs and tricky details etc. Or to care all that much, really. But I do care somewhat of course. And those details can be clever. So anyway, of course I was going to read this book.
So - yes, it's a quick read. It's a play, so much of the action is just missing (since we're not watching it). But I think that was a plus in this case. The point of this book was not so much to tell a story as to provide some final (or maybe not final, who knows) morsels of HP canon to the faithful, while not rocking the boat on the closure provided by #7. So we knew that 1) we were going to see our old friends, as many as possible and 2) nothing was going to happen ultimately to wreck with that epilogue scene from the end of the series. Because of 1), time travel was a natural choice, if a cheap device - if allowed reintroduction of characters like Snape (dead, of course) and the menace of Voldemort. Time travel, though, being a cheap device, did tilt the story over in the direction of fan-fiction (what-ifs and whatnot). From 2), we knew that all this wrecking with timelines would be solved to satisfaction, but I guess we knew that anyway. Still, did somewhat remove the suspense...
A third element to the book's composition, which is predictable but maybe not as much, was the psychological exploration of Harry's psyche via his son. The later books have gotten more into the those aspects of his character (and others, and and relationships, etc), so I guess it was natural that, from a distance of years, Rowling would go a bit wild with it. It's all very plausible - honestly I don't think Harry was all that much of a likable character by the time we got through all his issues, and I guess making his son a Slytherin loner was good follow-through. If JK had wanted uncomplicated happiness, Harry and Hermione would have married. But I suppose this is a more interesting path.
So anyway, yeah. Reads a bit like fan fiction, but quick and mildly clever in the time-travel solution. If I liked the books more I'd probably have a stronger opinion one way or the other, but as it is, interesting follow up to well-written and engaging series. Would totally see the play.
So - yes, it's a quick read. It's a play, so much of the action is just missing (since we're not watching it). But I think that was a plus in this case. The point of this book was not so much to tell a story as to provide some final (or maybe not final, who knows) morsels of HP canon to the faithful, while not rocking the boat on the closure provided by #7. So we knew that 1) we were going to see our old friends, as many as possible and 2) nothing was going to happen ultimately to wreck with that epilogue scene from the end of the series. Because of 1), time travel was a natural choice, if a cheap device - if allowed reintroduction of characters like Snape (dead, of course) and the menace of Voldemort. Time travel, though, being a cheap device, did tilt the story over in the direction of fan-fiction (what-ifs and whatnot). From 2), we knew that all this wrecking with timelines would be solved to satisfaction, but I guess we knew that anyway. Still, did somewhat remove the suspense...
A third element to the book's composition, which is predictable but maybe not as much, was the psychological exploration of Harry's psyche via his son. The later books have gotten more into the those aspects of his character (and others, and and relationships, etc), so I guess it was natural that, from a distance of years, Rowling would go a bit wild with it. It's all very plausible - honestly I don't think Harry was all that much of a likable character by the time we got through all his issues, and I guess making his son a Slytherin loner was good follow-through. If JK had wanted uncomplicated happiness, Harry and Hermione would have married. But I suppose this is a more interesting path.
So anyway, yeah. Reads a bit like fan fiction, but quick and mildly clever in the time-travel solution. If I liked the books more I'd probably have a stronger opinion one way or the other, but as it is, interesting follow up to well-written and engaging series. Would totally see the play.
Sunday, August 21, 2016
The Drama, Without the Romance
And of course, next had to be the second Bollywood book, A Bollywood Bride. Of course, I had high hopes for this one following the first. But... just going to get right to it, somewhat disappointed. This one, rather than taking the fan-fiction level romance cue from A Bollywood Affair, took the drama, drama, drama of the hero's damaged childhood and subsequent healing. This time, it's the heroine who needs some healing - and boy, she does. Some serious stuff going on there. Which, in and of itself, not a really a point in favor. But beyond that, what about the romance? Not what I'd call a chic lit romance at all! It wasn't about them discovering feelings for each other, it was about Ria fighting with herself and with Vikram about being together despite all that other stuff.
So yeah... not really romantic. Lots of drama. Interesting Indian culture though. And a romance in the sense that they get together at the end. And he's a great guy. But still. A disappointment after the first, no question about it.
Verdict: 2.75/5
So yeah... not really romantic. Lots of drama. Interesting Indian culture though. And a romance in the sense that they get together at the end. And he's a great guy. But still. A disappointment after the first, no question about it.
Verdict: 2.75/5
Labels:
American,
chic lit,
Indian,
mental illness,
romance
I Luv Bollywood
And now for something different. Well not that different ;) But new! Over the past years, I have of course seen many recommendations on austenprose, lauren willing, and wherever else. And of course, can't remember most of them, having not written them down. But one recent one that stuck in my head was the recommendation of The Bollywood Affair (or maybe it was for the second novel, which came out more recently). Lots of positive stuff from the romance club, seemed worth reading. So I picked it up along (both books by the new author, Sonali Dev) on my recent library trip.
Bollywood, for anyone who didn't know, is the Indian film industry. I've only watched a few Bollywood movies (Aisha, based on Emma, and a few on Netflix) but I have *thoroughly* enjoyed what I've seen. Their rom-coms are so unapologetically rom-com. Chock full of fun scenes and moments and whatnot. And The Bollywood Affair is really a book version of that. It reads like fan fiction in the setup (arranged marriage, plane crash etc) and in the plot developments (accident + recuperation, wedding, night away together and all that). It's so much fun, unashamedly. It was substantially less appropriate than the Bollywood films I see (which are squeaky clean) but that didn't bother me (though I honestly, I can do without). And it didn't rely all on the physical stuff to build the romance - it was maybe a bit Mary Sue-ish in fact, with Mili's various talents and uniquely wonderful soul, and Samir's secret kindness, deep loyalty, and model good looks, but still, there's what to love in both main characters. And as for plot... not much ;) There's a lot of emotional squishiness to untangle (mostly on Samir's side) but easy enough to live with the drama.
This was a thoroughly fun book, most definitely quite close to fan fiction, but eh, not complaining. It was written decently enough and the Indian culture stuff was interesting. Zipped through it (read instead of my Shabbos nap) and am eager to recommend to others :)
Verdict: 4/5
Bollywood, for anyone who didn't know, is the Indian film industry. I've only watched a few Bollywood movies (Aisha, based on Emma, and a few on Netflix) but I have *thoroughly* enjoyed what I've seen. Their rom-coms are so unapologetically rom-com. Chock full of fun scenes and moments and whatnot. And The Bollywood Affair is really a book version of that. It reads like fan fiction in the setup (arranged marriage, plane crash etc) and in the plot developments (accident + recuperation, wedding, night away together and all that). It's so much fun, unashamedly. It was substantially less appropriate than the Bollywood films I see (which are squeaky clean) but that didn't bother me (though I honestly, I can do without). And it didn't rely all on the physical stuff to build the romance - it was maybe a bit Mary Sue-ish in fact, with Mili's various talents and uniquely wonderful soul, and Samir's secret kindness, deep loyalty, and model good looks, but still, there's what to love in both main characters. And as for plot... not much ;) There's a lot of emotional squishiness to untangle (mostly on Samir's side) but easy enough to live with the drama.
This was a thoroughly fun book, most definitely quite close to fan fiction, but eh, not complaining. It was written decently enough and the Indian culture stuff was interesting. Zipped through it (read instead of my Shabbos nap) and am eager to recommend to others :)
Verdict: 4/5
Culmination Kind of Flat
You might think that posting so recently after my last update, the latest review would be fresh in my mind. You'd be mostly right but... things go fast on vacation. I'm already 3 books behind - so onward and upward. As I mentioned in the last post, next on my list was, of course, the final Pink Carnation, Jane's story. In contrast to #11 about a pair of minor characters and a plot that doesn't really tie in with the Pink Carnation's work at all, #12 features Jane herself as the heroine, in the thick of her spy war on Napoleon. So it was going to be different for sure. I quite enjoyed #11, with its relative lack of plot and clean-slate characters, so the burden was on #12 to prove as enjoyable when back in the thick of the action. On the other side was #10, Miss Gwen's story, which suffered from introducing us the the woman behind the parasol, and rendering the previously redoubtable heroine vulnerable. And if this was a problem for Miss Gwen... Throughout the Pink Carnation series, Jane has remained ever calm and unruffled while pulling all the strings and knowing all the things. So who wouldn't want to hear her love story?
Thus far we have the awesome Jane, ready for her hero. As for the hero himself, I have nothing particularly bad to say of him, though I would say Jane is substantially more awesome (unlike her French counterpart and one-time flame The Gardener, but apparently he's destined for someone else (Lizzy) - two alpha spies can't work? whatever, I'm really fine with that). But the issue comes down to the same thing as #10 - how to render the heroine sympathetic without damaging that sheen of omniscience? Personally, I don't know why Jane had to be rendered so vulnerable, but what do I know? Lauren Willig not only introduces us to her inner doubts (fine enough I guess) but moves the story along two years, placing her outside her old Paris network and outside the pale of polite society (disowned by her family). Why, why, why? By making Jane so far from awesome, it deprives us of the treat of the coup de grace of Pink books.
So ok, let's try to judge the book on its own merits rather than as the culmination of the series. As far as it goes, lots of spy plot, which is not a plus in my book. Portuguese countryside instead of Regency London. And the romance? I just feel like Pink romances are all the same - rather than a true angsty, suspensful back-and-forth true progression of a relationship, it's all professional interaction + an undercurrent of a certain type of tension, denying it because of said professional interaction, and culminating in a declaration. It just gets old, you know? Maybe it's really the way most romances go (at least those with more.. err.. physical description). But these are the ones I read, so that's where I see the repetition. Anyway, yeah, it just felt like same, same, and not necessarily that enjoyable.
Oh well, right? Still, same as #10 - fast, easy read of a romance. Shouldn't be that critical. And looking forward to reading the standalones! Not hampered by any of the same-same (hopefully :)) And it was certainly fun to wrap it all up with the various characters.
Verdict: 3.5/5
Thus far we have the awesome Jane, ready for her hero. As for the hero himself, I have nothing particularly bad to say of him, though I would say Jane is substantially more awesome (unlike her French counterpart and one-time flame The Gardener, but apparently he's destined for someone else (Lizzy) - two alpha spies can't work? whatever, I'm really fine with that). But the issue comes down to the same thing as #10 - how to render the heroine sympathetic without damaging that sheen of omniscience? Personally, I don't know why Jane had to be rendered so vulnerable, but what do I know? Lauren Willig not only introduces us to her inner doubts (fine enough I guess) but moves the story along two years, placing her outside her old Paris network and outside the pale of polite society (disowned by her family). Why, why, why? By making Jane so far from awesome, it deprives us of the treat of the coup de grace of Pink books.
So ok, let's try to judge the book on its own merits rather than as the culmination of the series. As far as it goes, lots of spy plot, which is not a plus in my book. Portuguese countryside instead of Regency London. And the romance? I just feel like Pink romances are all the same - rather than a true angsty, suspensful back-and-forth true progression of a relationship, it's all professional interaction + an undercurrent of a certain type of tension, denying it because of said professional interaction, and culminating in a declaration. It just gets old, you know? Maybe it's really the way most romances go (at least those with more.. err.. physical description). But these are the ones I read, so that's where I see the repetition. Anyway, yeah, it just felt like same, same, and not necessarily that enjoyable.
Oh well, right? Still, same as #10 - fast, easy read of a romance. Shouldn't be that critical. And looking forward to reading the standalones! Not hampered by any of the same-same (hopefully :)) And it was certainly fun to wrap it all up with the various characters.
Verdict: 3.5/5
Labels:
chic lit,
French revolution,
historical,
Napoleon,
Portugal,
Regency,
romance,
spies
Thursday, August 18, 2016
Tangent Proves Worthy
And now, the first of my new library books.. it's boring I'm afraid :) Moving on the Pink Carnation series with #11, The Mark of the Midnight Manzanilla. If you recall, I did not enjoy #10 (book from my inaugural trip to the library), but wasn't sure how much of it was due to the protaganist (Miss Gwen) as opposed to a general descent in the series or to my own changing tastes. So this was a good opportunity to test which one it was. #11 is about Sally Fitzhugh, quite a minor character in previous novels, and the Duke of Belliston, non-existent before this book. Clean slate, as it were.
Sally reminds me a lot of previous heroines - practical, somewhat naive, valient, loyal, friendly - shades of Henrietta, Letty, Arabella etc. Belliston is a brooding mystery man, in the mold of Lord Vaughn, Andre Joeun, and Colin himself. So even more than with some of the previous books, there was a feeling of deja vu / been-there-done-that at the start. But that being said, Sally is beautiful, confident, and unredoubtable. Lucien, while he is withdrawn and mysterious, does not have the cold hauteur of Lord Vaughan, but an open and friendly personality once you "get to know him". In other words, likeable, relatable hero and heroine.
The story is the usual - spies, murders, lots going on outside of the romance. But fast-paced enough, taking place within the confines of London and aristocratic country society, involving a fake engagement, so nothing to complain about. The romance not bad either... though honestly, these books are not actually the greatest romances - very little angst, and not enough suspense. But a solid enough love story, definitely. And, in some definite praise - 1) started reading the car on the way down to Maryland and enjoyed enough to get me quite a way through by the time we got there 2) disappointed by the Kerry Jennings Walsh loss in the semifinals, consoled myself by finishing the book before I went to sleep. So I can say that I absolutely enjoyed this one.
So.. conclusion? My dissatisfaction with the last book, probably mostly due to Miss Gwen rather than to a general decline in the series. Change in taste definitely still somewhat there, but not enough so that I didn't enjoy a generic PC with a generic heroine. Older, prickly leading ladies just not to my taste. What a snob am I.
Meanwhile, liked this book and certainly looking forward to #12, Jaaaane herself. Will be somewhat funny to pick up the main thread of the series after this book was a complete tangent, but I have hope that Jane's story will be worth all the spy stuff.
Verdict: 4/5
Sally reminds me a lot of previous heroines - practical, somewhat naive, valient, loyal, friendly - shades of Henrietta, Letty, Arabella etc. Belliston is a brooding mystery man, in the mold of Lord Vaughn, Andre Joeun, and Colin himself. So even more than with some of the previous books, there was a feeling of deja vu / been-there-done-that at the start. But that being said, Sally is beautiful, confident, and unredoubtable. Lucien, while he is withdrawn and mysterious, does not have the cold hauteur of Lord Vaughan, but an open and friendly personality once you "get to know him". In other words, likeable, relatable hero and heroine.
The story is the usual - spies, murders, lots going on outside of the romance. But fast-paced enough, taking place within the confines of London and aristocratic country society, involving a fake engagement, so nothing to complain about. The romance not bad either... though honestly, these books are not actually the greatest romances - very little angst, and not enough suspense. But a solid enough love story, definitely. And, in some definite praise - 1) started reading the car on the way down to Maryland and enjoyed enough to get me quite a way through by the time we got there 2) disappointed by the Kerry Jennings Walsh loss in the semifinals, consoled myself by finishing the book before I went to sleep. So I can say that I absolutely enjoyed this one.
So.. conclusion? My dissatisfaction with the last book, probably mostly due to Miss Gwen rather than to a general decline in the series. Change in taste definitely still somewhat there, but not enough so that I didn't enjoy a generic PC with a generic heroine. Older, prickly leading ladies just not to my taste. What a snob am I.
Meanwhile, liked this book and certainly looking forward to #12, Jaaaane herself. Will be somewhat funny to pick up the main thread of the series after this book was a complete tangent, but I have hope that Jane's story will be worth all the spy stuff.
Verdict: 4/5
Labels:
chic lit,
English,
French revolution,
historical,
Napoleon,
Regency,
romance,
spies
Wednesday, August 17, 2016
Lesser Known Works of a Master
Hello again - I have been reading but lazy to do reviews, because it's been Heyerville. And then I moved on to P&P and figured it'd take a while to finish so I had time. But then... vacay! And before I left (yesterday) I went to the library and got 7! new books to read (squee). All familiar authors. So exciting to go to the library after a 4 year break :) Anyway, I put P&P down and picked the new books up. Finished one already, so it is *urgent* that I get those Heyers done. So here you are, weeks late (oh well).
The three Heyers are
- April Lady
- The Unknown Ajax
- Faro's Daughter
These books are all not on my most-read or most-favorite Heyer list, but I have read them all more than once and I do own them all, so you know, second-tier. And here's what I have to say (again) - GH is the maaaaan! I mean second-tier, schmecond-shmier! I enjoyed all these 3 *thoroughly*.
First, April Lady. I always considered this book to be somewhat romantic, but for some reason did not love it. Maybe not enough romance? Too much else going on? Nell is, to put it elegantly, a simpleton? Maybe there's some truth to it, but I absolutely found the romance delightful and the story eminently readable. I stayed up late reading it as I was enjoying it so much. There are a lot of fun, subtle moments, and it's a real sweet story.
Next, Unknown Ajax. Now this one, I know I never enjoyed much because of the lack of romance / too much story. It definitely has a lot of story - didn't bother me as much, but that's a general pattern, I care more about the writing and less about the story than I used to. But what stuck out here - the Major! What a character. Witty, kind, resourceful, strong, and wealthy and titled to boot ;) And in love with "our Anthea" Smushes. I love this stuff.
Finally, Faro's daughter. Why doesn't this one make my favorites? Here I think the issue was probably more the characters themselves. Max Ravenscar is one of those all-powerful types who are too cool for the story's own good - you never want them humbled or beaten because that would get in the way of the mystique but the whole point of the story is to to see them humbled (with love). I will say that, though Deb battles Max she never really does humble him outside of the usual humbled by love part. Anyway, I would say that my impression of the book didn't really change in this case. I definitely found the battle between Deb and Max to be a bit ridiculous and not necessarily enjoyable reading, but overall it's still a GH (I also think I ranked this one a bit higher than the other two, at least than The Unknown Ajax, in previous readings).
Anyway, yeah so that's all I have to say on these. I heart GH, even those less familiar ones.
The three Heyers are
- April Lady
- The Unknown Ajax
- Faro's Daughter
These books are all not on my most-read or most-favorite Heyer list, but I have read them all more than once and I do own them all, so you know, second-tier. And here's what I have to say (again) - GH is the maaaaan! I mean second-tier, schmecond-shmier! I enjoyed all these 3 *thoroughly*.
Next, Unknown Ajax. Now this one, I know I never enjoyed much because of the lack of romance / too much story. It definitely has a lot of story - didn't bother me as much, but that's a general pattern, I care more about the writing and less about the story than I used to. But what stuck out here - the Major! What a character. Witty, kind, resourceful, strong, and wealthy and titled to boot ;) And in love with "our Anthea" Smushes. I love this stuff.Finally, Faro's daughter. Why doesn't this one make my favorites? Here I think the issue was probably more the characters themselves. Max Ravenscar is one of those all-powerful types who are too cool for the story's own good - you never want them humbled or beaten because that would get in the way of the mystique but the whole point of the story is to to see them humbled (with love). I will say that, though Deb battles Max she never really does humble him outside of the usual humbled by love part. Anyway, I would say that my impression of the book didn't really change in this case. I definitely found the battle between Deb and Max to be a bit ridiculous and not necessarily enjoyable reading, but overall it's still a GH (I also think I ranked this one a bit higher than the other two, at least than The Unknown Ajax, in previous readings).
Anyway, yeah so that's all I have to say on these. I heart GH, even those less familiar ones.
Monday, July 4, 2016
Powerfully Depressing Humor
My in-laws are the best thing ever to happen to my reading list in terms of sophistication. I was at their house for Shabbos and once again, had no reading material of my own (possibly forgot to bring, possibly had none, do not remember), and so I selected a book from their shelves full of mostly classics (and some science fiction, thrillers of little interest to me). (This is the fiction bookshelf, somewhere else in the house they have boxes of non-fiction that never got unpacked after the recent construction). Dov said Catch-22 was Grandpa's favorite book and that he had found it hysterical, plus I always meant to read it, so it seemed a good choice. I started it then, and probably would not have bothered finishing it, but Dov took it home because he wanted to read it himself. Then I had nothing to read over Shavuos because I neglected to go to the library, and so I read most of it then. So that's the when and the why. Now the what.
Catch-22 is a classic (of course) and thus I knew it would probably be 1) somewhat serious thematically and 2) well-written (see the title to my post about Slaughterhouse-5). I also expected it to be quite witty, as Dov and Grandpa apparently find it to be. And no surprise, it was all of these. Definitely very clever in the wordplay and in the carefully constructed absurdities of situation and character. About the very serious themes of war and the "system". And certainly, searingly powerful in its depictions of wartime on and off the battlefield, the muddy grit of army life and the petty machinations of the brass. This was a book that stays with you. As Yossarian loses friend after friend and the venal colonels, generals, and other officers fight it out among themselves, we keep on hoping, keep on getting frustrated, and keep on reading. As wrenching as it is, the palpable absurdity of it all remains amusing.
But, but but but... though I could see the humor in it all, I couldn't see past it. In the end of they day, I found the book incredibly sad, very depressing, and not really true. Not only do all (or almost all) of Yossarian's friends end up dead, none of the good guys are punished. Yossarian himself (and Orr) escape the carnage, but does it really help that one man stands up to the bland cruelty of Catch-22? While the perpetrators of the system perpetuate still, with no check on their ambitions. And of course, philosophically, while I know this world looks like a Catch-22 sometimes, we know it's far from that. But I guess there's no point in trying to read these books while comparing them with Jewish philosophy. If everyone believed what I believe, there would probably not be many classics :) The book does do a superb job of painting a world that, while not our world, is far too close to it in its patent unfairness and lack of reward for goodness. I guess I just can't see what's funny about it, even when it's told in such an amusing way.
Verdict: 4/5
Catch-22 is a classic (of course) and thus I knew it would probably be 1) somewhat serious thematically and 2) well-written (see the title to my post about Slaughterhouse-5). I also expected it to be quite witty, as Dov and Grandpa apparently find it to be. And no surprise, it was all of these. Definitely very clever in the wordplay and in the carefully constructed absurdities of situation and character. About the very serious themes of war and the "system". And certainly, searingly powerful in its depictions of wartime on and off the battlefield, the muddy grit of army life and the petty machinations of the brass. This was a book that stays with you. As Yossarian loses friend after friend and the venal colonels, generals, and other officers fight it out among themselves, we keep on hoping, keep on getting frustrated, and keep on reading. As wrenching as it is, the palpable absurdity of it all remains amusing.
But, but but but... though I could see the humor in it all, I couldn't see past it. In the end of they day, I found the book incredibly sad, very depressing, and not really true. Not only do all (or almost all) of Yossarian's friends end up dead, none of the good guys are punished. Yossarian himself (and Orr) escape the carnage, but does it really help that one man stands up to the bland cruelty of Catch-22? While the perpetrators of the system perpetuate still, with no check on their ambitions. And of course, philosophically, while I know this world looks like a Catch-22 sometimes, we know it's far from that. But I guess there's no point in trying to read these books while comparing them with Jewish philosophy. If everyone believed what I believe, there would probably not be many classics :) The book does do a superb job of painting a world that, while not our world, is far too close to it in its patent unfairness and lack of reward for goodness. I guess I just can't see what's funny about it, even when it's told in such an amusing way.
Verdict: 4/5
Thursday, June 9, 2016
Sometimes, Same Silly is Simpatico
And now for the second library pickup - so I was in the library with two kids, not really the time for browsing. I just needed an author I could check for for quickly. PG Wodehouse was the one who popped up - not sure why - maybe because I think of his books as filler between others? Maybe because old libraries tend to have his book and this library looked pretty old? I think I had heard him mentioned somewhere in the relatively recent past and it just stuck in my head. Anyway, that’s what I searched for, and that’s what I found - Jeeves and the Tie That Binds (I think the only Jeeves book they had). So Wodehouse - now, talk about sameness (see review below), these books are all exactly the same. I have no idea if I’ve ever read this particular one since its plot is so exactly like all the other Jeeves and Wooster books I’ve come across. This one was actually PG Wodehouse’s 90th birthday book, so I think it was deliberately derivative (nice, right?) but really they are all the same. You don’t read these books for the plot, that’s for sure.
So what do you read them for? Well the setting, for one thing (again :)) I just love that English aristocratic countryside, even if it’s early-twentieth century (between the wars maybe? don’t even know), not Regency. The jokes - silly references and plays on words, along with absurd situational comedy (that’s the long form of sitcom, which is probably not what I want - but I mean comedic situations :)) The ever-so-comfortable antics of vapid-but-amiable Bertie, a host of mean, silly, hearty, and other people, and the wise Jeeves who always cleverly saves the day. After a while, it can all get old, especially with poor Bertie always trying to do the right thing and always getting stuck in the wrong, but you just have to let it all roll off. Does make for a less engaging read, but still very easy to get through :) And inspires me to such eloquence in review, you see? He really was quite the master, that PG. Will continue reading the same book over and over :)
Verdict: 3.5/5
10 Books In, Has the Premise Run Its Course?
Well I finally did it - almost 4 years after my last trip to the library (August 2012), I put my kiddos in the car and drove the (very short) drive (could have walked but then would have had to deal with the stroller) to the Edison library. Excitingly enough, this library is less than a 10 minute walk from the house, and right near the train station where I come/go every day, but it took me this long to get there (and I lived for over a year in Carteret without ever taking a book out there (used the Manhattan library though) and in HP without even getting a library card, but anyway). So what was my first pick? Lauren Willig of course. I think I even wrote on an FB post on her page once that it would be. How embarrassing :) I didn’t have much browsing time, I got one more book (more anon of course), but let’s just focus on Willig first.
So as you know ;), I’ve been reading these books for a long time. They are favorites of mine because they are regency romance but not the romance genre (have more literary pretensions). They are also of the historical mystery/drama genre, but less so than, say, Deanna Raybourn or Tasha Alexander. Anyway, Regency, romance, not trash, and nice and light. What’s not to like, of course. So yeah I do like these books. In recent years (well not that recent), I have noticed a “sameness” about them, and also somewhat liberal anachronism and silliness, so I can’t say I find them *that* well-written, but you know, they are pretty good. Neat enough phrasing, if a bit too pat. So that’s in the past few years. (I have read her books since I stopped going to the library, since I own two of them, so it’s not going back all that far necessarily. You’ll have to read old reviews to see how far it does go back ;). On top of this recent impression, and really more along with it, I think I have less tolerance for empty romance than I used to - I need something more in a book than an implausible romance and less-than-mediocre writing. Not saying that describes Pink Carnation books, just that my tastes have changed (matured, perhaps :)) in that respect.
So anyway, back to this particular book, it’s about Miss Gwen (I was, by the way, 3 books behind in the series, as well as not having read the 3 non-Pink books written in recent years, so quite a lot of material :) This was the least recent of the series books.) Miss Gwen is Jane’s companion, a lady of mature years and prickly demeanor. So not the most endearing of characters, at least as the heroine of a romance. The book is supposed to show her softer side, but I’m not sure I want to see her softer side. I liked her as the steely chaperone Miss Gwen, more ambivalent about “Gwen”. The Captain is a debonair and likable figure, but I’m not sure I buy the romance. It’s not forced or anything, just rather… shallow? Here’s where I’m not sure if I’m just picking up on the “sameness” thing (so boring because same), if the books have gotten worse, if my tolerance is lower, or if I really just don’t like seeing Miss Gwen’s softer side. Here’s hoping it’s the last, since I like being able to thoroughly enjoy my books.
Not that I didn’t enjoy the book. It was light reading, which I never mind. It had romance, it had some action, I guess a few laughs. It had characters I care about and the setting I love. So can’t really complain, and look for reviews of the last two books of the series shortly :)
Verdict: 3/5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















